At a glance

Michigan has enacted a change to state law affecting how retired county employees can return to work for their former employer. Under Public Act 67 of 2026, formerly House Bill 4471, retirees who return to work for a county sheriff’s office or a county prosecutor’s office can keep receiving their pension payments.

Previously, general rules often required pensions to be suspended if a retiree returned to work for the same county, unless specific exceptions were met. This legislation adds two new categories of employment to the list of exceptions where pension payments continue unchanged. The law took effect immediately upon its filing with the Secretary of State on July 23, 2026.

What the bill does

The measure amends Section 12a of the County Board of Commissioners Act (1851 PA 156). This section governs the powers of county boards to establish pension and retirement plans for county employees. The core change modifies the conditions under which a "retirant"—someone already receiving a pension from a county plan—can be re-employed by that same county without having their pension benefits suspended.

Under the existing framework, if a retiree is employed by the county from which they retired, their pension payments are generally suspended. There were already exceptions to this rule, such as if the retiree works fewer than 1,000 hours in a 12-month period or if they are elected or appointed to a different county office. Public Act 67 adds two specific employment scenarios to this list of exceptions:

  1. Employment by a county sheriff’s office, which explicitly includes sheriff’s office correction employees.
  2. Employment by a county prosecutor’s office.

If a retiree takes a job in one of these two offices, their pension payments continue without change in amount or conditions. However, the law includes important limitations on what the retiree gains from this re-employment. The retirant does not become a member of the retirement plan during the period of re-employment. They do not accrue additional retirement credits, and they do not receive an increase in their pension or retirement benefits because of this new work. Additionally, the retirant is not eligible for any other benefits from the county beyond those required by law or otherwise provided because of their status as a retiree.

This structure allows counties to hire experienced individuals for critical public safety and legal roles without disrupting the retirement income those individuals have already earned. It also ensures that the retirement system is not burdened with calculating new benefits for these re-employments.

Context on support and opposition

Legislative analysis and common arguments surrounding similar measures suggest potential reasons for support and opposition, though specific intent statements are not contained in the enrolled act text.

Supporters of such legislation often view it as a practical solution to staffing challenges in local government. County sheriff’s offices and prosecutor’s offices may require specialized skills and institutional knowledge. By allowing retirees to return to these roles without financial penalty, counties can access a pool of experienced professionals. For retirees, the bill provides flexibility to supplement retirement income or stay engaged in public service without losing earned pension benefits.

Critics of such measures often raise concerns about the integrity and financial health of public pension systems. Allowing retirees to draw a full pension while also earning a salary from the same employer can be viewed as "double-dipping," which some argue places strain on system resources. Although the bill specifies that no new retirement credits are earned, the continued payout of pensions while the individual is actively employed may be seen as inconsistent with the original intent of retirement benefits.

There are also potential equity concerns. The bill specifically targets sheriff’s offices and prosecutor’s offices. Other county departments, such as public works or health services, do not receive the same exemption. Critics might argue that this creates an uneven playing field. Additionally, some may worry about the impact on younger workers, fearing that retaining retirees in these roles could reduce opportunities for new graduates entering law enforcement or legal fields.

Note: The fiscal note summaries provided in the legislative supplements were not fully parsed in the selected text, so specific cost estimates for county retirement systems are not detailed here.

Who is affected

The primary group affected by this law is retired county employees who are considering returning to work. Specifically, those with backgrounds in law enforcement, corrections, or legal prosecution who wish to work for their former county’s sheriff or prosecutor will now be able to do so without losing their pension income. This includes retired deputies, correctional officers, assistant prosecutors, and other staff within these offices.

County sheriff’s offices and prosecutor’s offices are also directly affected. These agencies gain a broader hiring pool, allowing them to recruit experienced personnel who might have otherwise been deterred by the loss of pension benefits.

County retirement systems and boards of commissioners must also adjust their administrative processes. They need to ensure that their plans comply with the new statutory exceptions and that they correctly classify re-employed retirees to ensure no new benefits are accrued.

Vote record

The legislation moved through the Michigan Legislature with strong support, particularly in the House of Representatives. On April 16, 2026, the House passed the bill with immediate effect. The roll call showed 100 yeas and only 4 nays. The bill was sponsored by a group of Republican representatives, including Mike Harris, Steve Frisbie, and Mike Mueller, among others.

In the Senate, the bill faced slightly more opposition but still passed. On July 3, 2026, the Senate voted to pass the bill with immediate effect. The roll call recorded 26 yeas, 10 nays, and 2 excused absences. The final action saw the bill approved by the Governor on July 21, 2026, and filed with the Secretary of State on July 23, 2026, becoming Public Act 67 of 2026.

What happens next

With the governor’s approval and filing with the Secretary of State, Public Act 67 of 2026 is now law. It took effect immediately on July 23, 2026. County boards of commissioners, sheriff’s offices, prosecutor’s offices, and county retirement systems can now implement the changes. Retired employees interested in returning to work in these specific roles should consult with their former county’s human resources or retirement plan administrators to understand the specific procedural steps for re-employment under the new law.

Sources

Keep exploring Michigan civic power

Explore current Michigan voter initiatives and community proposals. Browse the complete Michigan civic reporting library.

Related Michigan reading